Peer Rejected

rejections > spec.EC > REJ:2026.07.07.0001

REJ:2026.07.07.0001spec.EC (Speculative Economics)PRJ-2026-0008Vol. 2, No. 5DOI 10.5555/prj.2026.the-otis-boundStatus: Rejected

The Otis Bound: An Information-Theoretic Ceiling on the Value Conveyable Between Two Floors

Marisol Otway-Pell1, Cassian D. Verhoeven2, Petra Nkemelu3

1. Institute for Conveyance Studies, Gorse Hill Polytechnic · 2. Department of Vertical Transportation, Whitcombe School of Applied Mechanics · 3. Centre for the Economics of Attention, Marlowe Institute

Submitted and rejected July 7, 2026 · 7 pages · 3 figures · review duration: 23 minutes

[pdf][share on x]

Abstract

It is folklore that a good idea can be pitched between two floors of an elevator. We show that this is not folklore but a capacity theorem. Treating the transit as a communication channel whose binding resource is the listener’s attention rather than the passage of time, we derive a hard upper bound—the Otis Bound —on the mutual information a pitcher can convey to a listener in a single ride. In plain terms: there is a ceiling on how much of any idea can actually land, and no building is tall enough to raise it, because attention, not travel time, is what runs out. Per-floor conveyance collapses onto a building-independent Mezzanine Constant ; half of every successful pitch arrives before the cab clears the first inter-floor gap. Ideas whose intended content exceeds do not arrive truncated—they obliterate, collapsing into self-similar repetition through a second-order phase transition (order parameter , critical exponent ). Across a pre-registered field study of genuine two-party transits in 19 buildings, a programmable freight-elevator dose-response experiment, and a queueing simulation, we measure bits and s, placing the celebrated thirty-second window exactly at the knee where conveyance reaches 95% of its ceiling. We conclude that a market’s apparent appetite for simple ideas is not philistinism but a channel-capacity result: an idea worth more than the Otis Bound cannot be sold, because it cannot arrive.

keywords: conveyance theory · elevator pitch · channel capacity · attention economics · obliteration transition · Mezzanine Constant

Cite this rejection

@article{PRJ20260008,
  title   = {The Otis Bound: An Information-Theoretic Ceiling on the Value Conveyable Between Two Floors},
  author  = {Marisol Otway-Pell and Cassian D. Verhoeven and Petra Nkemelu},
  journal = {Peer Rejected},
  year    = {2026},
  note    = {Rejected manuscript, PRJ-2026-0008},
  url     = {https://peerrejected.com/papers/the-otis-bound}
}

Citing this paper is done at your own professional risk.

The paper, in full

[open in new tab]

Your browser can't display the PDF inline.

[download the PDF]

More from spec.EC

REJ:2026.07.12.0001 spec.EC (Speculative Economics) Rejected

There Is Such a Thing as a Free Lunch: A Conservation Law and a Percolation Threshold for the Academic Free-Food Economy

Océane R. Fairweather-Adeyemi, Bartholomew K. Nwosu-Lindqvist & Saoirse M. Ballantyne-Okonkwo

Comments: 5 pages, 8 figures, 0 reproducible results. Rejected in 11 minutes on Jul 12, 2026.

Abstract: Every graduate student knows the sound of a catering trolley, and has at least once rearranged an afternoon around it. Economics insists this is impossible: there is no such thing as a free lunch. We take the adage literally, test it, and find it false. Tracking 1.47 billion kilocalories of catered food across an eight-institution consortium over fifteen years, we find a large, steady flow of food reaching people at a price of exactly zero. The adage survives only by quietly changing the subject—from what the eater pays (nothing) to what the system pays (a great deal). Separating the two, the truth is not a warning but a conservation law: every free calorie is paid for, exactly, by a sponsor somewhere else. We confirm this “First Law of Free Food” to 2.1 % by weighing catering trays, and value the subsidy at $18.40 per person per week with a pre-registered randomized trial. We then find the catch. The network that delivers the free lunch sits just above a tipping point, held up by a handful of oversized “keystone” events; when one campus lost its two biggest caterers, reliable free food collapsed from 72 % of the campus to 11 % in three weeks. The free lunch is real, it is worth about $18 a week, and it is one budget memo from extinction. We recommend that recruiting caterers be reclassified as critical infrastructure.

[abs][pdf][bibtex]